Independence supporters need to embrace GERS | Autonomy Scotland

Independence supporters need to embrace GERS

Cover image is from Steven Camley and appeared in the Herald. You can see more of his images and purchase them here.

A quick glance at twitter shows that many Unionists are taking great pleasure at the state of the Scottish Economy. They are gloating that by voting No they have saved Scotland from self destruction. Today, Conservative leader Ruth Davidson will even go as far as to thank those 2 million No voters who have prevented the country from being sucked into the fiscal black hole.

And on the face of it the figures are pretty damning. The Scottish budget deficit including a geographic share of oil was £14.9bn, or just under 10 percent of GDP. This gives Scotland the highest budget deficit (as a percentage of GDP) of any OECD country. In comparison, the UK deficit is 4.9 percent of GDP.

Many Nationalists are happy to decry the figures stating that they are only estimated and no conclusions can be drawn from them as to the financial state of an Independent Scotland. There may be an element of truth to this but it is not the right way to go about persuading people to vote Yes in a second referendum. There is already a perception held by many Unionists that Independence voters are economically illiterate and burying our heads in the sand at bad news isn’t going to change that. We can’t continue to do as many Unionists also do, hail the figures when they back up our argument and ignore them when they don’t.  This type of data is what people will be using to make a decision if a snap second referendum is called in the aftermath of the Brexit vote.

The first thing to note is that it is not all bad news. The rise in the onshore economy almost covered the losses made by the decline in oil revenues. The economy is growing, our employment rate is higher than the UK as a whole. Our output per head and our growth of productivity has outstripped the UK. Our exports are doing well. Spending on capital projects and economic growth is over £400 per head higher than the UK, meaning that some of the large deficit could be viewed as an investment that will reap future dividends.

That said, the size of the deficit is a worry that we should not shy away from. Our political opponents and the general public certainly will not.

Some Unionists are from the Too Wee, Too Poor, Too Stupid camp. They seem to take pleasure in the fact that we are running a massive deficit as it proves Scotland would be a basket case if Independent. Others talk of the broad shoulders of the Union, they point out that the UK has a diverse economy so constituent parts can lean on each other when they need to. At the moment the Scottish economy is not doing as well so the UK economy can step up and shoulder some of the burden.

However, if the Scottish economy is struggling it is doing so while it is largely controlled from London. If Scotland had not been in the Union it would have run a surplus for most of the last 34 years. It is reasonable to presume that we would be a country with a large oil fund, which would be more useful than any broad shoulder when dealing with a downturn. Instead we have a large overspend and a share of UK debt. You can see this clearly in the following article by Professor Brian Ashcroft (who is not a nationalist). I don’t see how Scotland can be benefiting from the broad shoulders of the Union when by being in the Union we are much worse off than we would have been otherwise. There is an argument that we would be better remaining in the Union going forward due to our current position but that is like advising a kidnap victim to remain in their dungeon, escaping would be a fanciful idea due to the years of incarceration rendering them incapable of looking after themselves. At least the dungeon is shelter and provides regular meals.

But the past is in the past and we need to admit that at the moment things are not looking great. Many of the problems we have could be alleviated by a revival in the oil price but even that would be covering up the two main long-term issues; the structure of our economy and our ageing population. It is here we need to focus in order to convince people that they would be better off in the long term outside of the UK.

With regards to the first problem our economy needs to diversify. This could happen in the confines of the UK but there is little evidence that it will. The UK economy is imbalanced towards London at the detriment of the rest. The Scotland Bill will see Scotland gain control of income tax but that is only a small part of the powers we need to create the economic conditions for change. Most of the main economic levers needed to grow and shape our economy are still reserved.

We also have a demographic timebomb in Scotland where we have far too few working age people in proportion to those who have retired. This is a problem that we need to fix with focused immigration but the UK government has made it harder than ever for skilled people to come and work here. It is a clear case of immigration policies being tailored to the South at the detriment of Scotland, particularly harsh is the ban on the Student Work Visa that is depriving Scotland of highly educated productive people who could help close the deficit.

The question we need to ask is, given that the problems occurred while most economic levers are controlled in London, are we going to resolve these issues more easily from outside or inside the UK?

To conclude, those arguing for Independence should embrace, not run away from, the financial situation as those we need to convince will be aware of it. We can’t just wish it away. What we need to do is highlight that the figures illuminate Scotland’s condition within the Union and not what it would be like if we had full control over our affairs. Unlike many Unionists, who seem to be content with a future Scotland perpetually subsidised by the rest of the UK. We need to prepare and sell a robust economic case for dealing with the key issues we face. We lost the last referendum because we failed to do this.

Please comment below and enter an email address to receive notifications of new articles. Also, if you enjoy our content you can support the site for less than one pound per month by clicking here.

 

Spread the love

You may also like...

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
IanOpa Is The New Sláinte? | thehistorytwinsKenny Mactavish (@kenmactavish)George Patersoncharlesobrien08 Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest
charlesobrien08
Guest

Every time I read or hear something about how Scotland would have been had we had the courage to vote for independence,I cringe at the most obvious and glaring omission,they make the calculations on the basis that we would follow in Westminster’s footsteps,really they make the same mistakes time after time.I really believe that not only would a “black hole” appear in our fiscal arrangements because we do NOT follow in the failed systems of the UK governments.We looked and we have learned,John Swinny has done marvellous with what little we had been gracelessly given back from our taxes and… Read more »

George Paterson
Guest

I became a Scottish Nationalist long before oil was discovered in the North Sea. If those at the time had voted for Independence just think of the bounty we would have gained and that in spite of the Labour liars at Westminster (and the Scots in it). Oil was not the reason for my nationalism. It was to release the energies and resources we had to run our own country in our own way and not beholding to our neighbours to make living in Scotland a reality. We are a strong, wealthy country with adequate potentials to run Scotland and… Read more »

Kenny Mactavish (@kenmactavish)
Guest

“At least the dungeon is shelter and provides regular meals.” It might be interesting to put a little flesh on the meagre bones of that statement… Like how we in Scotland are not “kidnap victims in a dungeon”, but willing partners in a neighbourly relationship in which, if required (like now), we can overspend by 7.5%*, every year, in perpetuity, with our neighbours picking up the tab? Say those neighbours stumped up nearly £10 Billion of their own cash to facilitate our ability to overspend with such impunity. Think on that. Most people would agree that £10bn is not a… Read more »

trackback

[…] Scotland would end up in as bad or worse shape than Greece (hence the comic.) This blog post by Autonomy Scotland made sense to me and was very thorough. Another opinion also made sense but seemed a bit […]

Ian
Guest
Ian

Out of the 15 bn “deficit”, 6bn is the share of UK spending which is attributed to Scotland. Breaking down this six billion over which we have absolutely no control….. Some of it is necessary. But it also includes things our contribution to HS2, trident, illegal wars, the new runway at Heathrow and in the past the 2012 Olympics (but obviously the 2014 common wealth games which Scotland had to fund on its own. GERS just seems designed to make us look worse than we really are!

Click icon now to support Autonomy Scotland for free.

Join our mailing list for weekly updates.